|
The jurisprudence of concepts was the first ''sub-school'' of legal positivism, according to which, the written law must reflect concepts, when interpreted.〔that means that the interpretation of the words stated in the law must be guided by the scientific concepts that these words represent.〕 Its main representatives were Ihering, Savigny and Puchta. This school was, thus, the preceding trigger of the idea that law comes from a dogmatic source, imposition from man over man and not a ''natural'' consequence of other sciences or of metaphysical faith. Among the main characters of the ''jurisprudence of concepts'' are: * formalism, search of rights in written law * systemisation * search for justifying specific norm with basis from more generic ones. So, according to this school, law should have prevailing sources based upon the legislative process, although needing to be proven by more inclusive ideas of a social sense. == See also == * Jurisprudence of values * Jurisprudence of interests * Philosophy of law * Legal positivism * Legal naturalism * Hermeneutics 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Jurisprudence of concepts」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|